From owner-cvs-all Tue May 4 14:21:37 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F40314C36; Tue, 4 May 1999 14:21:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA17023; Tue, 4 May 1999 23:21:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id XAA60501; Tue, 4 May 1999 23:21:22 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 23:21:21 +0200 From: Eivind Eklund To: Matthew Jacob Cc: Guy Helmer , "Kenneth D. Merry" , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/mt mt.1 Message-ID: <19990504232121.C49159@bitbox.follo.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.1i In-Reply-To: ; from Matthew Jacob on Tue, May 04, 1999 at 12:11:36PM -0700 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Tue, May 04, 1999 at 12:11:36PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote: > To follow up on this for the rest of CVS committers- What I see a lot of > in FreeBSD commits is changes w/o checking with nominal last authors of > code (and man pages are code). If it isn't that hard to do, can we please > check with each other- even on trivial things- it's not *that* much extra > email. The problem isn't the amount of e-mail you have to send out. The problem is that a lot of people don't bother/remember to reply, which means you have to keep track of a million changes (with PR numbers etc if applicable) over a period of time, instead of being able to handle the case at once. You can't even rely on e-mail on the subject coming back as a way of finding out when to handle it. Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message