From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 30 15:01:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2478106566B for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:01:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xorquewasp@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f218.google.com (mail-fx0-f218.google.com [209.85.220.218]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 557CF8FC13 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:01:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm10 with SMTP id 10so3092051fxm.14 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:01:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:received :x-authentication-warning:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to; bh=6nQvliBVFHPKuRCLs8MBJKH606jMHgYdRTB744PbSK8=; b=t7XS0X7+Q1zf9UTbM1bhLZxsJqn3UBxdUh+ZeN7Z1YIoaABDWEcZhfknP9XxDt/z4C POrp3gGuQjiGmlMoq3rzIwPWHk6dJKY54bN9TfSCFxaWKRQ6w9OXQ6jwgE06a1DPkQZb T+SqiYwaLIoJmpkeOZj8Jfee5BEHGNLklJdpM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=x-authentication-warning:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to; b=VwJv8eXToPIcykyIyN7OX8zYKcBy4txg5fhXTa2ty/Le4vxk17p/0gVUwQCvT6GT4e 1/nqRT5S9ZKTDOdWbouaGvIUz0sYLXzbbbgEw6XwGmZgrygiQJMkaf4cTeIFyscxyzD1 d2LdRq5lTg0YEMW+c3Ac9nGoxOrUYpXH9yseQ= Received: by 10.216.85.17 with SMTP id t17mr1473568wee.178.1259593291087; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:01:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from viper.internal.network (dsl78-143-202-207.in-addr.fast.co.uk [78.143.202.207]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t2sm10460219gve.9.2009.11.30.07.01.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:01:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from viper.internal.network (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by viper.internal.network (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88EE24AC25; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:01:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from m0@localhost) by viper.internal.network (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nAUF1RtK040701; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:01:27 GMT (envelope-from xorquewasp@googlemail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: viper.internal.network: m0 set sender to xorquewasp@googlemail.com using -f Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:01:27 +0000 From: xorquewasp@googlemail.com To: Ivan Voras Message-ID: <20091130150127.GA82188@logik.internal.network> References: <20091130142950.GA86528@logik.internal.network> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UNIX domain sockets on nullfs still broken? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:01:33 -0000 On 2009-11-30 15:43:01, Ivan Voras wrote: > xorquewasp@googlemail.com wrote: > > 76030 initial thread STRU struct sockaddr { AF_LOCAL, /tmp/jack-11001/default/jack_0 } > > 76030 initial thread NAMI "/tmp/jack-11001/default/jack_0" > > 76030 initial thread RET connect -1 errno 61 Connection refused > > I would expect to see this result from the jail since it's obviously a > Bad Idea, but does it work from the same (host) machine without the jail > in between (i.e. just the nullfs, no jails)? Hm, yes, you're right. It does work without a jail involved. What's the sane solution, then, when the only method of communication is unix domain sockets? xw