Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 16:07:22 -0700 From: Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net> To: Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@stack.nl> Cc: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: conf/146053: [patch] [request] shutdown of jails breaks inter-jail dependencies Message-ID: <4BD76E2A.7080504@delphij.net> In-Reply-To: <20100427224101.GD7165@stack.nl> References: <201004272159.o3RLxqbr085070@freefall.freebsd.org> <20100427224101.GD7165@stack.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2010/04/27 15:41, Jilles Tjoelker wrote: > On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 09:59:52PM +0000, jilles@FreeBSD.org wrote: >> Old Synopsis: shutdown of jails breaks intra-jail dependencies >> New Synopsis: [patch] [request] shutdown of jails breaks inter-jail dependencies > > Is there any reason why someone may want to have jails shut down in the > same order they were started, instead of in the reverse order? Yes I believe this is useful. For instance, one may run LDAP service in one jail and e-mail service in another, and wants LDAP service always be available to e-mail services. Cheers, - -- Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net> http://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or die -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJL124qAAoJEATO+BI/yjfBk3oIAML6kcBda9uY3Djq8uptS2Mb J4XaAD9HyJNx73ZvAT2CBQrevujueNSDfWEdIscl0ltI25sN5oD5n8goIV2USuD/ yfLcNijvJk2FSX5QF5i/2OWcjMO7X05hI4Gv7j72pA+mMoH83TpqKgWPfb34qQ/h D6n7EEmh8l/htmGS5fU5aHfFDg3hkUPj0oUwiTMsF/k0cgNLlzsBJPtrNnVHlzZt TGIqr/b93M80NU87pYZEjvnYw5A0I6mdYoZc8NbgZV1S5hNDHKcE2FJVIzH2Dyw/ 0+8TANwJf/C4TSFieokmmyNxDpCG8qWKMMOk6i85Pxj1yXEv4vb79vScz9Ov4F4= =cOGf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4BD76E2A.7080504>