From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 26 23:15:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28AE81065675 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 23:15:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-fs@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8CD68FC14 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 23:15:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-fs@m.gmane.org) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KuEp5-0001ln-7I for freebsd-fs@freebsd.org; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 23:15:03 +0000 Received: from 200.41.broadband11.iol.cz ([90.178.41.200]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 23:15:03 +0000 Received: from gamato by 200.41.broadband11.iol.cz with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 23:15:03 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org From: martinko Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 23:45:09 +0100 Lines: 14 Message-ID: References: <6eb82e0808030743hc41c68bgd0c5121daba95d42@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 200.41.broadband11.iol.cz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.17) Gecko/20081009 SeaMonkey/1.1.12 In-Reply-To: <6eb82e0808030743hc41c68bgd0c5121daba95d42@mail.gmail.com> Sender: news Subject: Re: journaling filesystem X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 23:15:12 -0000 Rong-en Fan wrote: > In NetBSD, they now have metadata journaling support, see > > http://www.netbsd.org/changes/#wapbl > > I'm not a fs guru, I just want to know what are the status of > BluFFS and UFS journaling support which were mentioned > in recent years. > > Thanks, > Rong-En Fan This is very interesting! I can imagine this would be the way for systems where ZFS is not an option but SU are reaching their limits.