From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 5 16:19:12 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5689CE2A for ; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 16:19:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from smtp.eutelia.it (mp1-smtp-5.eutelia.it [62.94.10.165]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 116141636 for ; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 16:19:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ns2.biolchim.it (ip-188-188.sn2.eutelia.it [83.211.188.188]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.eutelia.it (Eutelia) with ESMTP id D98E615921B for ; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 18:19:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-171-130.41-151.net24.it [151.41.130.171]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns2.biolchim.it (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r65GIt6L019387 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 18:19:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: ns2.biolchim.it: Host adsl-ull-171-130.41-151.net24.it [151.41.130.171] claimed to be soth.ventu Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.7/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r65GIiVq045794 for ; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 18:18:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <51D6F1E4.4090001@netfence.it> Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 18:18:44 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130626 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Possibly OT: NFS vs SMB performance Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.73 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.73 on 10.1.2.13 X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (ns2.biolchim.it [192.168.2.203]); Fri, 05 Jul 2013 18:19:00 +0200 (CEST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 16:19:12 -0000 Hello. Sorry to ask here: maybe it's not the best place, but it might be a start (the client and server are both FreeBSD). The server exports the same directory via NFS and via SMB. I'd expect some performance penalty when using SMB, but: "find /nfs_mounted_dir >/dev/null" takes more or less 1 minute; "find /smb_mounted_dir >/dev/null" takes nearly 10 minutes. Is this normal in your experience? bye & Thanks av.