From owner-freebsd-arch  Thu Oct 10  7:38:59 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 89FDB37B401; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 07:38:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.92.13.169])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1092E43EAF; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 07:38:54 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com)
Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.6/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g9AEck5b001521;
	Thu, 10 Oct 2002 07:38:46 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com)
Received: (from obrien@localhost)
	by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.6/8.12.5/Submit) id g9AEck8X001520;
	Thu, 10 Oct 2002 07:38:46 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 07:38:45 -0700
From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>
To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>, bde@FreeBSD.org,
	Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: lp64 vs lp32 printf
Message-ID: <20021010143845.GA1448@dragon.nuxi.com>
Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org
References: <20021009220522.GA65943@dragon.nuxi.com> <XFMail.20021010093021.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20021010093021.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT
Organization: The NUXI BSD Group
X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3  90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A
X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-arch.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-arch>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-arch>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 05:17:20PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> I'm not sure if I like 'H'.  It's closer to the floating point
> specifiers
> [EFG] than to the hex specifiers [xX].


On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 09:30:21AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> Perhaps "%y" instead of %H?  It's closer to %x and was somewhat agreed upon
> earlier.

I was looking for something actually implied what the thing does.  It
took too much digging to figure out what it meant.  That is why I picked
'H' for Hex.  Does anyone have a more suggestive letter than y?

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message