From owner-freebsd-questions  Mon Dec  4 15:51:15 2000
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Dec  4 15:51:10 2000
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from claire.namodn.com (namodn.com [209.0.100.49])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76FC737B401
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Mon,  4 Dec 2000 15:51:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from robert by claire.namodn.com with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 1435Nm-00036S-00; Mon, 04 Dec 2000 15:50:54 -0800
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 15:50:54 -0800
From: Rob <robert@namodn.com>
To: questions@freebsd.org
Subject: NAT and SSH tunneling
Message-ID: <20001204155054.A11649@claire.namodn.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Organization: Namodn Artists - http://www.namodn.com
X-OS-Type: Debian GNU/Linux 2.2
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hi,


I'm trying to do an SSH tunnel through a FreeBSD server 
running natd to a CVS server listening to a pserver on
it's local interface.

I have managed to get this working from a routeable IP,
but when I attempt to set up a tunnel from a non-routeable
that is being NAT'd, the non-routeable machine opens the
port ( 2401 ) but it doesn't seem to make it to the other
side ( the CVS server outside the NAT firewall ).

Is there a special consideration for SSH tunnels through
NAT that I am not understanding? Is it actually possible? :)

Thanks, and please reply to me directly as I am subscribed
to the list from this account.


Rob Helmer
Namodn


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message