From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 24 17:32:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3338316A4CE for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 17:32:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.tiadon.com (SMTP.tiadon.com [69.27.132.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C320343D58 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 17:32:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [69.27.131.0] ([69.27.131.0]) by ns1.tiadon.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:31:38 -0600 Message-ID: <41A4C53D.908@daleco.biz> Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:30:37 -0600 From: "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20041023 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Robinson References: <41A431CA.2040506@theatre.msu.edu> <20041124072513.GN65445@iconoplex.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20041124072513.GN65445@iconoplex.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Nov 2004 17:31:52.0486 (UTC) FILETIME=[7C691C60:01C4D24B] cc: "Jonathan T. Sage" cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Copyright Issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 17:32:04 -0000 Paul Robinson wrote: >On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 02:01:30AM -0500, Jonathan T. Sage wrote: > > > >>and on that note, did they continue that copyright infringment on the >>actual product? Cause my spidey sense is sensing that machine being sold >>out soon. (come on, you're all thinking how much you want a daemon >>packaged condom on your workstation. admit it.) >> >> > >I've heard it called many, many things before but I think that's the >first time I've heard somebody refer to it as a "workstation". Your >partner is either very geeky, or very tolerant... > >Why do I get the feeling that we're now going to be bombarded with slang >terms, pet names (we really, really, really don't want to do pet names >by the way - I have no interest in knowing what various committers call >their genitals), double and single entendres and this is all going to >get very homoerotic and slightly uncomfortable to watch? > > ROFLMBU...as if geeks needed a whole new class of acronyms! Suppose we can get some added to the "Jargon File"?? KDK