From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Feb  4 20:02:57 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: net@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD87D106564A;
	Sat,  4 Feb 2012 20:02:57 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from melifaro@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mail.ipfw.ru (unknown [IPv6:2a01:4f8:120:6141::2])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DADC8FC1B;
	Sat,  4 Feb 2012 20:02:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from v6.mpls.in ([2a02:978:2::5] helo=ws.su29.net)
	by mail.ipfw.ru with esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.76 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <melifaro@FreeBSD.org>)
	id 1Rtlp6-000KwG-5X; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 00:03:00 +0400
Message-ID: <4F2DC674.4070401@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:59:48 +0000
From: "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
	rv:9.0) Gecko/20120121 Thunderbird/9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org>
References: <20120205.033532.381149506660559829.hrs@allbsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120205.033532.381149506660559829.hrs@allbsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: sem@FreeBSD.org, mark@mivok.net, net@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: [CFT] multiple FIB support in route(8)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2012 20:02:57 -0000

On 04.02.2012 18:35, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> Hello,
>
>   Can anyone review/test the attached patch to add "-fib number" option
>   to route(8)?  This should simplify static route configuration across
>   multiple FIBs in rc.conf.  Just adding an -fib option like the
>   following will do the trick without changing rc.d/routing:
>
>    static_routes="foo bar"
>    route_foo="10.1.1.1/24 192.168.2.1 -fib 2"
>    route_bar="10.1.1.1/24 192.168.2.1 -fib 3"
>
>   The -fib option is supported in all subcommands but monitor.
Why should we leave `monitor` as is?

And, even if we really need to do so why "route monitor" silently 
accepts and ignores -fib X key?
>
> -- Hiroki