From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 23:07:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CF2E16A4CE; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 23:07:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp4.server.rpi.edu (smtp4.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08DE943D1F; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 23:07:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp4.server.rpi.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i1F77RHQ031225; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 02:07:28 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20040215060047.GA62840@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <20040215060047.GA62840@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 02:07:26 -0500 To: Marcel Moolenaar From: Garance A Drosihn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca) cc: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org cc: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Back to the Future - 64-bit time_t on sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 07:07:29 -0000 At 10:00 PM -0800 2/14/04, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: >On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 10:53:00PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote: >> >> Adventurous people are invited to try this for installs on any >> system, and let me know how it goes > >No problems. It's actually very painless. Good to hear. Thanks. >The "mergemaster -p" is probably a bit too much, as well as the >second mergemaster provided that the machine has been upgraded >prior to starting the 64-bit time_t transition. I wanted to keep the directions as "general" as possible, such that they gave the correct commands for almost any upgrade. I only did changes specific to this 64-bit time_t upgrade where I absolutely had to (mainly the 'installworld_oldk' script). >Also, the first "shutdown -r" can probably be a reboot. Hmm. Yeah, that would probably be a good idea. >In any case: good job! Thanks. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu