From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Sep  9 00:37:37 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id AAA20665
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 9 Sep 1997 00:37:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id AAA20612
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 9 Sep 1997 00:37:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id IAA18398 for hackers@freebsd.org; Tue, 9 Sep 1997 08:26:57 +0200
From: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
Message-Id: <199709090626.IAA18398@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
Subject: interrupts in interrupt routines
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 1997 08:26:57 +0200 (MET DST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Excuse my ignorance...

am I correct in assuming that within an interrupt driver interrupst are
masked according to the imask declared in the config line ?

e.g. 

    device pcm0 at isa? tty ... vectpr pcmintr

results in pcmintr() being called at spltty ?

	Cheers
	Luigi