From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Apr 4 05:25:13 1996 Return-Path: owner-chat Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id FAA27277 for chat-outgoing; Thu, 4 Apr 1996 05:25:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns.ge.com (ns.ge.com [192.35.39.24]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id FAA27265 for ; Thu, 4 Apr 1996 05:25:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from crissy.gemis.ge.com ([3.29.7.57]) by ns.ge.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id IAA20478; Thu, 4 Apr 1996 08:24:53 -0500 Received: from salem.ge.com (carsdb.salem.ge.com [3.29.7.15]) by crissy.gemis.ge.com (8.6.11/8.6.11) with SMTP id IAA10180; Thu, 4 Apr 1996 08:24:49 -0500 Received: from combs.salem.ge.com by salem.ge.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA27816; Thu, 4 Apr 96 08:24:47 EST Received: from localhost (steve@localhost) by combs.salem.ge.com (8.7.5/8.6.11) with SMTP id IAA05170; Thu, 4 Apr 1996 08:24:47 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 4 Apr 1996 08:24:45 -0500 (EST) From: "Stephen F. Combs" Reply-To: CombsSF@salem.ge.com To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: Nate Williams , freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: your mail In-Reply-To: <2613.828580014@time.cdrom.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I hadn't heard 'Codpiece' in over 20 years! ;-> Nate, It was a sack which was hung at the front of a mans pants. It was around LOOOOONG before buttons or zippers. Men bragged by establishing, shall we say, extravagent codpiece sizes!?! ;-) ---- Stephen F. Combs Internet: CombsSF@Salem.GE.COM GE DS&TC Voice: 540.387.8828 Network Services Home: CombsSF-Home@Salem.GE.COM 1501 Roanoke Blvd FAX: 540.387.7106 Salem, VA 24153 LapTop: CombsSF-Mobile@Salem.GE.COM On Wed, 3 Apr 1996, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > Date: Wed, 03 Apr 1996 17:06:54 -0800 > From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" > To: Nate Williams > Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org > > > I was thinking that the 'freemen' in Montana would be appropriate. You > > know, the kind of folks who are unhappy about any form of government, > > and resetn anyone taking away their 'constitutional right' to write bad > > checks. Then again, maybe that's not a great group to market since they > > might shoot you if you're bad, and not pay you if your good. :) > > No, no, that's brilliant! An entirely new demographic! > > We just have to remember not to let them pay by check. I wonder if > two chickens a performance is too high a gate price. We can probably > work a deal with Frank Purdue to turn them back into cash (or, at the > very least, eat for free while on the road!). > > > First of all, you need to tell me what a codpiece is.. > > I haven't the, erm, heart to explain this to Nate. Anyone > else here braver than I? > > Jordan >