From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 8 16:59:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A76716A41C for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 16:59:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.232]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B85F543D48 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 16:59:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 06F7F5125D; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 12:59:47 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 12:59:47 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Matthias Buelow Message-ID: <20050608165947.GB79586@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050608001306.3FB1F43D5C@mx1.FreeBSD.org> <42A6C7CE.9000002@incubus.de> <200506080908.02478.fcash@ocis.net> <42A71AE1.8020300@incubus.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DBIVS5p969aUjpLe" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42A71AE1.8020300@incubus.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 16:59:49 -0000 --DBIVS5p969aUjpLe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 06:20:49PM +0200, Matthias Buelow wrote: > Freddie Cash wrote: >=20 > > The only problem we've had with FreeBSD 5 is one system running 5.2.1 t= hat=20 > > ran for over a year just fine, but would not complete a buildworld=20 > > (hardware has died and it has been retired, so it's not an issue any=20 > > more). >=20 > I remember 5.2.1 panicking left and right, on several machines, it was > completely unusable. Maybe we just live in different universes. Right, it was a developer preview release that was not intended for production use. Kris --DBIVS5p969aUjpLe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCpyQDWry0BWjoQKURAnf7AKDJcPvwMeNAZnnL03rKIWQ+Dx2kzACeIPAb syLQ2YjyDna9JyZsA3CpsWc= =/pz9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DBIVS5p969aUjpLe--