From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 7 12:20:04 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABF6716A4CE for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:20:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.191]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28B6A43D4C for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:20:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from [212.227.126.207] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1Cy7s0-0005Md-00; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 13:20:00 +0100 Received: from [84.128.142.85] (helo=donor.laier.local) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1Cy7rz-0004s9-00; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 13:20:00 +0100 From: Max Laier To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:19:45 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <20050207.182021.68162131.cjh@kr.FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20050207.182021.68162131.cjh@kr.FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart11094761.d8MM0qn8HZ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200502071319.57331.max@love2party.net> X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:61c499deaeeba3ba5be80f48ecc83056 cc: CHOI Junho Subject: Re: kernel mode httpd/ftpd for FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 12:20:04 -0000 --nextPart11094761.d8MM0qn8HZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 07 February 2005 10:20, CHOI Junho wrote: > Anyone knows about kernel-mode httpd/ftpd for FreeBSD? (just like tux > of linuxI searched several times but failed. No there is not. In my humble opinion it's a *really* bad idea to implemen= t=20 something that vulnarable to external attacks and buffer overflows inside t= he=20 kernel. The often claimed performance benefit can as easily be achieved wi= th=20 accept filters (see esp. accf_http(9)) and kqueue(9). There is really no=20 need to put this into the kernel. =2D-=20 /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News --nextPart11094761.d8MM0qn8HZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD4DBQBCB1ztXyyEoT62BG0RAjIUAJixL35S86m5SEXeTlA9gAmBHxf/AJ9u89b4 CFWZZ+6FkfWTU3FHfcecGQ== =3r00 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart11094761.d8MM0qn8HZ--