Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:57:24 -0400 (EDT) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dev_t / udev_t confusion ? Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040609105609.90795C-100000@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <53993.1086779790@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > Personally I don't think there is much need for a long discussion and I > would prefer to see simply a show of hands for yes and no, and any hear > any really heavy duty arguments pro et contra. Sounds good to me -- I ran into this recently with the audit implementation because Solaris embeds a "udev_t" in the BSM audit format. Since the format is handled by the kernel as well as user space, I had to do the usual gymnastics to work around the udev_t confusion. I'd love to see that resolved, thanks! Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Senior Research Scientist, McAfee Research
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040609105609.90795C-100000>