From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 25 08:20:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E2916A4CE for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 08:20:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hobbit.neveragain.de (neveragain.de [217.69.76.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CF5443D2D for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 08:20:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from amf@hobbit.neveragain.de) Received: from hobbit.neveragain.de (amf@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i9P8KpVs016785 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 25 Oct 2004 10:20:51 +0200 Received: (from amf@localhost) by hobbit.neveragain.de (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i9P8KpFN016783; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 10:20:51 +0200 Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 10:20:51 +0200 From: Dennis Koegel To: Philipp Huber Message-ID: <20041025082051.GB16445@neveragain.de> References: <3.0.6.32.20041025084122.007cdb50@mail.uk2.net> <10582.1098690276@www44.gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <10582.1098690276@www44.gmx.net> X-PGP-KeyID: 0D73E19A User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.4 (hobbit.neveragain.de [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 25 Oct 2004 10:20:51 +0200 (CEST) cc: Graham Bentley cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GPL vs BSD Licence X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 08:20:54 -0000 On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 09:44:36AM +0200, Philipp Huber wrote: > > But equally important is the ability to join back forks, when/if some > > group finds the right solution to a problem. And that's where the > > GPL comes in: you can really think of the whole license as nothing > > more than a requirement to be able to re-join a forked project from > > either side. > > i don't really get what the gpl or bsd license has to do with rejoining > forks. why shouldn't bsd licensed projects be able to refork in case... Because Juniper, for example, are perfectly free to decide against making their changes to the (in this case) FreeBSD code available anyone at all. For them, that may be a positive thing, because they don't have to open their work for the competition. But this is exactly what the GPL is aiming to avoid. HTH, - D.