From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 10 08:10:16 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5646FAF7 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 08:10:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.multiplay.co.uk (smtp1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BF1C26CD for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 08:10:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp1.multiplay.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 65534) id BA21D20E7088D; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 08:10:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.multiplay.co.uk X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.2 required=8.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DOS_OE_TO_MX, FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1,HELO_NO_DOMAIN,RDNS_DYNAMIC,STOX_REPLY_TYPE autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from r2d2 (82-69-141-170.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.141.170]) by smtp1.multiplay.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C925A20E7088B; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 08:10:07 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: From: "Steven Hartland" To: , "grarpamp" References: <20140610032018.GA46419@neutralgood.org> Subject: Re: ZFS import panic (kgdb backtrace attached) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 09:10:08 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 08:10:16 -0000 Thats known issue, there's been some improvements in later versions. ----- Original Message ----- From: > On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 02:37:36PM -0400, grarpamp wrote: >> ZFS pool was 96% full and under heavy sequential write, and panicked. > > You also probably noticed that with it that full performance was probably > total ass. > > Good practice says to not get a ZFS pool too full. Depending on who you > ask, "too full" ranges from 75-80-90%. > -- > Kevin P. Neal http://www.pobox.com/~kpn/ > > "I like being on The Daily Show." - Kermit the Frog, Feb 13 2001 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >