From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 23 17:17:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: x11@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE2D716A4A7 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:17:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan.algebra.com [216.254.65.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D32943DCA for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:17:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan [127.0.0.1]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5NHHM1S077695 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 13:17:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k5NHHMT8077694 for x11@freebsd.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 13:17:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) From: Mikhail Teterin To: x11@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 13:17:21 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7whJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli" Cc: Subject: gears vs. glxgears; i915 for Linux binaries? X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:17:47 -0000 First of all, allow me to thank you for the working DRI on my laptop with i915 chipset. Although none of my Radeon desktops work yet, this is very welcome progress. After installing the linux_dri port, I wanted to compare the simple (glx)gears results between the Linux and the native binaries. The /compat/linux/usr/X11R6/bin/gears appears to be the same beast, as the ${X11BASE]/bin/glxgears installed by the native Xorg port. Running the Linux gears seemed VERY fast -- they were spinning like crazy but the program reports just 1800 frames per 5 seconds -- around 380 FPS (all for the default small window). Running the native glxgears appeared much slower, but the reported stats were ~2.5 times higher -- around 950 FPS. Now, the reported speed difference is, likely, due to the fact, that the linux_dri does not (yet?) install the i915_dri.so, so no DRI is (yet?) possible for Linux programs on my laptop. But why does it *appear* to be faster? Thanks! -mi