Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 21:42:12 +0200 From: Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org> To: kmacy@fsmware.com Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WINE vs. FreeBSD Message-ID: <200607232142.16501.lofi@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <b1fa29170607221559p2a72d607uafc0831edf0c2a78@mail.gmail.com> References: <200607221914.15826.lofi@freebsd.org> <200607222341.05180.lofi@freebsd.org> <b1fa29170607221559p2a72d607uafc0831edf0c2a78@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart6206001.iiAGvT54bV Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday, 23. July 2006 00:59, Kip Macy wrote: > Thanks. That is a useful data point but David Xu has done a lot of > work on libthr that has probably not been MFC'd back to 5.x. When I > get the chance I'll try building KDE on my desktop which runs a > derivative of -CURRENT. At least on FreeBSD 5, the problems with libthr aren't just limited to KDE= =20 (which really doesn't use threads all that much - Qt has limited support fo= r=20 threads, KDE has even less and actual multithreaded KDE programs are few an= d=20 far between) - running the base-system BIND as a local DNS cache for more=20 than an hour or so with a global mapping from libpthread to libthr active i= s=20 usually enough to expose the problem (i.e. name resolution will stop=20 working). =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --nextPart6206001.iiAGvT54bV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEw9EYXhc68WspdLARAtdoAJ9XaPWldgcf6PLcEBijXom1ftg1sACgp5KD uTRrUlTSPlNa6xYRM/nlo7s= =5VrI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart6206001.iiAGvT54bV--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200607232142.16501.lofi>