From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Jul 14 17:56:26 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8230137C62F; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 17:56:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id e6F0uLM22332; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 17:56:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 17:56:21 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Matthew Jacob Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG, marcel@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: I'm fixing the build/install kernel target Message-ID: <20000714175620.R25571@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <20000714172250.P25571@fw.wintelcom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: ; from mjacob@feral.com on Fri, Jul 14, 2000 at 05:34:14PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Matthew Jacob [000714 17:36] wrote: > > > > Making configuring a kernel more complex and error prone should > > have never happened. > > I'm not sure that this is a fixable problem, ultimately. We're already *so* > much better than what joe users do to themselves with the Registry on Windoze > that I think that valuable developer cycles could be better spent elsewhere > than worrying about kernel updates. Being better than Windows isn't really aiming that high now is it? -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message