From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 12 19:58: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ns.itga.com.au (ns.itga.com.au [202.53.40.210]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DFCB37B719 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 19:58:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnb@itga.com.au) Received: from lightning.itga.com.au (lightning.itga.com.au [192.168.71.20]) by ns.itga.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA17345; Tue, 13 Mar 2001 14:57:53 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from gnb@itga.com.au) Received: from itga.com.au (lightning.itga.com.au [192.168.71.20]) by lightning.itga.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA04964; Tue, 13 Mar 2001 14:57:52 +1100 (EST) Message-Id: <200103130357.OAA04964@lightning.itga.com.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.1 12/23/97 From: Gregory Bond To: Arjan.deVet@adv.iae.nl (Arjan de Vet) Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why does rc.shutdown not call '/usr/local/etc/rc.d/*.sh stop'? In-reply-to: Your message of Sun, 11 Mar 2001 18:16:28 +0100. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 14:57:52 +1100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > What's the reason that -stable still has that 'XXX not yet' here? I think to give a chance for all the ports to get updated with the new start/ stop handling in their respective rc files. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message