From owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 10 18:02:26 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 984131065678 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 18:02:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from r.c.ladan@gmail.com) Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A8C58FC45 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 18:02:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from r.c.ladan@gmail.com) Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so952755ywe.13 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:02:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=9pyTR8MeYjr9Wx40sg1qIzcQldUDxA2vMMBXQwxHHIY=; b=Mr2oXAE9sVdqDUp9k5AlHCVPlA136IO9crkDmQkGgTPT+fFgAOHWg6q1H5UzCt/APF 58EkqoxoV7R9iGmXmFIU+2bZlOHjiFiYFXxDRmg7e3Dqsw0mgftKTk1yQ8eZZNQdBiT2 tgpm3M6Yr4whAT25TYuMwsZ1H/53WHvWwtUaI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=c4jm229M+7JpjeJ20Srdt5bsTf4TURgdDojAm52ckghNiIVSvUF4DBJe7wt+qrz9aj rJaJeVRS0Dzh6PfyL8MEtVXNCdn47dnRxTB67E8GUnOJmMofqPn+5AaIydAeT8VZmzuu yTWOzql2AHc8YUWTS/gI+GpQGFw3viUSxkFO4= Received: by 10.150.92.13 with SMTP id p13mr10218415ybb.37.1226338305604; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 09:31:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.206.6 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Nov 2008 09:31:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 18:31:45 +0100 From: "Rene Ladan" To: "Giorgos Keramidas" In-Reply-To: <87fxlza3tj.fsf@kobe.laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200811090424.mA94OlN6087438@repoman.freebsd.org> <20081109084551.GB1058@gothic.blackend.org> <87hc6gbz3t.fsf@kobe.laptop> <20081109192507.GB1030@gothic.blackend.org> <87k5bc4ovw.fsf@kobe.laptop> <1226311326.84196.1.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk> <87fxlza3tj.fsf@kobe.laptop> Cc: cvs-doc@freebsd.org, freebsd-doc@freebsd.org, Gavin Atkinson , doc-committers@freebsd.org, Chin-San Huang , Marc Fonvieille Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/share/misc docbook.css X-BeenThere: cvs-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the doc and www trees List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 18:02:26 -0000 2008/11/10 Giorgos Keramidas : > On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:02:06 +0000, Gavin Atkinson wrote: >>On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 22:37 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >>>On Sun, 9 Nov 2008 20:25:07 +0100, Marc Fonvieille wrote: >>>> The new x-config.html is fine for me. >>>> For the new install-pre.html, the way is >>>> rendered looks oldish, maybe using the same scheme as for >>>> might do the trick. >>> >>> The bold red text is kind of `old school' for me too. I'll wait to see >>> if there are flames^W^H err, objections about the rest and update the >>> style too :) >> >> FWIW, I like the look of the new style sheet nore than the old one, but >> do agree with Marc about the new font used on - I assume >> this is due to the removal of "font-family: arial;" from >> BLOCKQUOTE.IMPORTANT. > > It's the line-height that makes things look funny. How about something > that makes Important notes stand out a bit like this version? > > http://people.freebsd.org/~keramida/bsd-css/2008.11.10/install-pre.html > > The changes to the `blockquote.IMPORTANT' class are: > > * Remove `color: red', `font-family: arial', `font-weight: bold' and > the custom `line-height'. > > * Add a bit of padding to avoid bumping into any
borders. > > * Add a red border with a thick left side that highlights the block. > > This way the font family is the same as the rest of the text and it > doesn't look weird if your default sans-serif font is, say, DejaVu > instead of Arial :) > > [ I'm undecided between making .IMPORTANT stand out with a red > background and this. A red background seems like something that can > hurt my eyes if I stare at it for a long time. This is _different_ that > the rest of the .NOTE, .EXAMPLE and so on. ] > > The result looks reasonable to me. I would not use an entirely red background for the warnings: they scream too much that way. I wonder if there are any standards on text formatting... Regards, Rene -- http://www.rene-ladan.nl/ GPG fingerprint = E738 5471 D185 7013 0EE0 4FC8 3C1D 6F83 12E1 84F6 (subkeys.pgp.net)