Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 09:37:01 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 198150] PHP 53 - 6 months EOL - this should not be in ports Message-ID: <bug-198150-13-qLN7wIeGIo@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-198150-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-198150-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198150 --- Comment #4 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Harrison Grundy from comment #3) In theory, this promise has vaguely been made although it is practically impossible to continuously enforce. The proposal also implicitly establishes RH as a security authority on PHP -- meaning the assumption is they are aware of *all* security holes in PHP 5.3 and patch them all. Frankly I don't trust RH to do this and even if I did, I don't trust all their patches to get into PHP 5.3 here in a timely and acceptable fashion. Where's the proof that this is happening now? We should be equivalent with PHP 53 in RH/Centos right now if it were happening, right? Are we? The safe play is to purge this version. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-198150-13-qLN7wIeGIo>