From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 13:40:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA5116A41F; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:40:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sschwerdhoefer@multamedio.de) Received: from imap.multamedio.de (imap.multamedio.de [62.52.48.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D550243D46; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:40:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sschwerdhoefer@multamedio.de) Received: by imap.multamedio.de (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 0738328EE2E; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:40:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from amalthea (124.net2.multamedio.de [62.52.48.124]) by imap.multamedio.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 860D628EC8E; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:40:52 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:36:00 +0100 From: Sebastian Schwerdhoefer To: Gleb Smirnoff Message-ID: <20060111133600.GF9151@localdomain> References: <20060111125354.GE9151@localdomain> <20060111131650.GC57606@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060111131650.GC57606@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: mutt X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on imap.multamedio.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Router with CARP: reproducible deadlock X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:40:57 -0000 Thanks for this fast reply! Gleb Smirnoff schrieb am 2006-01-11 um 14:16 Uhr: > This means that your NIC doesn't detect loss of Ethernet link. What > NICs do you use? Please demask "net1" and "net2". I already gave up and dismantled my test scenario, but with this information I'll give it another try soon. I'll have a look which NICs are used and possibly change them... But does this also mean, that carp depends on the ability of the NIC to detect link loss? regards, Sebastian Schwerdhoefer