From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 06:01:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 952E116A4CE; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 06:01:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from CPE000103d44c07-CM000f9f7ae88c.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com (CPE000103d44c07-CM000f9f7ae88c.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.193.222.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B8A743D5A; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 06:01:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from 172.16.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) with ESMTP id 43B1529585A; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 01:00:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from 172.16.0.200 (SquirrelMail authenticated user mikej); by 172.16.0.1 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 01:00:56 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4292.172.16.0.200.1101794456.squirrel@172.16.0.200> In-Reply-To: <200411301551.55756.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> References: <4013.172.16.0.200.1101790160.squirrel@172.16.0.200> <200411301551.55756.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 01:00:56 -0500 (EST) From: "Mike Jakubik" To: "Daniel O'Connor" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-wettoast-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-wettoast-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: mikej@rogers.com cc: stable@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No RAID for VT8237? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 06:01:02 -0000 Daniel O'Connor said: > On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 15:19, Mike Jakubik wrote: >> documentation stating which of the common onboard raid chipsets are >> supported. The motherboard in question is a gigabyte GA-K8VM800M. >> FreeBSD 5.3 detects the chipset, but shows the drives individually, not >> as an ar array. > > Did you define the array in the BIOS? > > I am not sure how good 5.3 is at defining arrays (man atacontrol says > atacontrol create should work but I've never used it). I doubt sysinstall > has ATA RAID creation support. Yes I did. RAID 1.