From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 5 06:33:25 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03CED16A419; Wed, 5 Dec 2007 06:33:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from kagate.punkt.de (kagate.punkt.de [217.29.33.131]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F17013C448; Wed, 5 Dec 2007 06:33:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from hugo10.ka.punkt.de (hugo10.ka.punkt.de [10.0.0.110]) by kagate2.punkt.de with ESMTP id lB565gcn045015; Wed, 5 Dec 2007 07:05:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from hugo10.ka.punkt.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hugo10.ka.punkt.de (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id lB565fVX091473; Wed, 5 Dec 2007 07:05:41 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ry93@hugo10.ka.punkt.de) Received: (from ry93@localhost) by hugo10.ka.punkt.de (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id lB565fum091472; Wed, 5 Dec 2007 07:05:41 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ry93) Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 07:05:41 +0100 From: "Patrick M. Hausen" To: Garrett Cooper Message-ID: <20071205060540.GA91260@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> References: <47541063.4010101@gmail.com> <475492DD.6090401@telia.com> <4755FD83.3020909@u.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4755FD83.3020909@u.washington.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Cc: "Aryeh M. Friedman" , Andreas Pettersson , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC/P] Port System Re-Engineering (Repost from -ports@) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 06:33:25 -0000 Mornin', On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 05:23:15PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: > Instead of asking all of the questions on a list, why not just direct > people to input information via a webpage? Seems to be a bit more effective > / less traffic than posting results to multiple lists.. Instead of sending the filled in questionaire to the list why not simply send it back to the original author as doubtlessly intended ...? ;-) Kind regards, Patrick -- punkt.de GmbH * Vorholzstr. 25 * 76137 Karlsruhe Tel. 0721 9109 0 * Fax 0721 9109 100 info@punkt.de http://www.punkt.de Gf: Jürgen Egeling AG Mannheim 108285