Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 06 Dec 2020 13:28:53 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        multimedia@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 251125] audio/jack: update to jack2 or add new port audio/jack2
Message-ID:  <bug-251125-12827-dP6WE7u6x6@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-251125-12827@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-251125-12827@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D251125

--- Comment #65 from Florian Walpen <dev@submerge.ch> ---
(In reply to Goran Meki=C4=87 from comment #64)

I haven't played around yet, but according to the build files and
https://github.com/jackaudio/jackaudio.github.com/wiki/JACK-DBus-packaging
there are two separate questions:
 * What to build and install - jackd (classic), jackdbus, or both
 * Autostart - either jackd or jackdbus

If the DBUS option is not selected we would configure --classic=3Dyes and
--autostart=3Dclassic anyway, right?

With DBUS enabled (default) I would prefer to build and install both, but
autostart jackdbus because we're able to start classic jackd separately via=
 rc
service. Like --classic=3Dyes and --dbus=3Dyes and --autostart=3Ddbus.
Does that make sense?

If that's not possible, just going classic jackd when DBUS is not enabled is
fine with me. My main concern is the difficulty of setting rtprio on the ja=
ck
server - I'm not a huge fan of glitches in recordings, it really complicates
software testing ;-)

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-251125-12827-dP6WE7u6x6>