From owner-cvs-all Sat Jun 27 11:50:52 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA13644 for cvs-all-outgoing; Sat, 27 Jun 1998 11:50:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from antipodes.cdrom.com (castles146.castles.com [208.214.165.146]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA13638 for ; Sat, 27 Jun 1998 11:50:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@antipodes.cdrom.com) Received: from antipodes.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antipodes.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA15655; Sat, 27 Jun 1998 11:50:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199806271850.LAA15655@antipodes.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: Harlan Stenn cc: committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: contrib-utized am-utils? In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 26 Jun 1998 11:59:34 EDT." <11123.898876774@brown.pfcs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 27 Jun 1998 11:50:00 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > I've contrib-utized am-utils, which should be a replacement for the current > amd stuff. > > The stuff I've done is suitable for both -stable and -current. > > Anybody have the time/inclination to review and commit? Have you addressed the stability and configuration issues? I recall that there were some comments regarding problems that had been experienced with am-utils, and I don't recall hearing whether they were commandline-compatible or whether we are looking at changes to the /etc/ files to match... -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message