Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 02 Apr 2012 09:06:06 +0200
From:      Bernhard Froehlich <decke@bluelife.at>
To:        Petro Rossini <petro.rossini@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: VirtualBox drama - failing VDI disks, VM not starting headless, Rebuild problems on 8.2 (clang related problem?) and 9-STABLE (libpcre.so.0)
Message-ID:  <784166fee4d71a2f571d1a455e4563a0@bluelife.at>
In-Reply-To: <CAExkqpfBBLi-reRn_x2K7vyasBU-uemi6rBoj%2BMTCJ01_FCiDQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAExkqpf8MK=zbFo5kfGQg0VfSjjSPKRQ0s%2B07aGKX6bArZmPHQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAExkqpcj8Ue69wiOaWmVaMpnWZAiq6_d4ecwEgSLnb37nJaYjw@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2BtpaK3NA0O6a4bZLGJ5ELs=L3Co455ZvwuWMY2UKYLt-8%2B=iA@mail.gmail.com> <CAExkqpdDyMnyA2u4kx1BZ4oz8HHcZ-ku5D_%2BV6xUx9Vk=oERFA@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2BtpaK0FYkkF6=3KATY5%2BXEMF-%2BAG96dRYTOd9WPk0V0kzs5ew@mail.gmail.com> <CAExkqpfBBLi-reRn_x2K7vyasBU-uemi6rBoj%2BMTCJ01_FCiDQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 02.04.2012 07:42, Petro Rossini wrote:
> Hi Adam and all,
>
> at the end my problem description I sent to -virtualization first.
>
> (Thanks Adam, to pointing out that I am barking up the wrong tree;-)
>
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Adam Vande More
> <amvandemore@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Petro Rossini 
>> <petro.rossini@gmail.com>
>>> > AFAICT, that error message is related to a permissions issue.  
>>> Can you
>>> > supply the VM log when you post the question to emulation?
>>>
>>> See you there:-) But there isn't much I found:
>>>
>>> 00:00:01.368 nspr-2   Loading settings file
>>> "/vboxes/zimbra/zimbra.vbox" with version "1.11-freebsd"
>>> 00:00:01.885 Watcher  ERROR [COM]: aRC=NS_ERROR_FAILURE 
>>> (0x80004005)
>>> aIID={5eaa9319-62fc-4b0a-843c-0cb1940f8a91} aComponent={Machine}
>>> aText={The virtual machine 'zimbra' has terminated unexpectedly 
>>> during
>>> startup with exit code 0}, preserve=false
>>
>>
>> I would like to see it in full if possible.
>
> [snip]
>
> Hi all,
>
> I had some VirtualBox hassle over the weekend.
>
> It started with thes messages inside the VM, a Ubuntu 10.04 Server
> (running Zimbra).
>
> 2012-03-30T18:37:11.581591+11:00 mail kernel: [4520695.304357] sd
> 4:0:0:0: [sdd] Unhandled error code
> 2012-03-30T18:37:15.201744+11:00 mail kernel: [4520695.304362] sd
> 4:0:0:0: [sdd] Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_TIMEOUT
> 2012-03-30T18:37:15.201753+11:00 mail kernel: [4520695.304366] sd
> 4:0:0:0: [sdd] CDB: Write(10): 2a 00 02 1d 44 f8 00 00 08 00
> 2012-03-30T18:37:15.201756+11:00 mail kernel: [4520695.304457]
> end_request: I/O error, dev sdd, sector 35472632
> 2012-03-30T18:37:15.201758+11:00 mail kernel: [4520695.312601]
> __ratelimit: 9 callbacks suppressed
> 2012-03-30T18:37:15.201761+11:00 mail kernel: [4520695.312604] Buffer
> I/O error on device sdd, logical block 4434079
> 2012-03-30T18:37:15.201763+11:00 mail kernel: [4520695.321978] lost
> page write due to I/O error on sdd
>
> Two hours later it moves to another disk: "sd 3:0:0:0: [sdc] 
> Unhandled
> error code"
>
> The Linux reacts with a read-only remount - practically the box is
> falling over.
>
> The VDI disks are on a ZFS filesystem, and I scrubbed the ZVolume and
> looked for other possible problems - host-side all seamt to be okay.
>
> I restarted the system once - and for a few hours it worked, untiul I
> see the same problem again.
>
> A second reboot is not that successful, I cannot start the VM 
> headless
> anymore, getting a
>
> Result Code: NS_ERROR_FAILURE (0x00004005)
>
> I have a second machine with the same setup and continous mirroring 
> of
> the disks (zfs send/receive) - the same result.
>
> Tried an older ZFS snapshot of the VDI disks - still not starting.
>
> It was FreeBSD 8.2 and VirtualBox 4.0.4, and some people with similar

You took the worst possible versions for your server so I hope it's not
an important one. FreeBSD 8.2 + ZFS has some significant known problems
that were fixed in 8-STABLE after the 8.2 release. Additionally
VirtualBox 4.0 until 4.0.8 is known to be unstable because they did a 
lot
of refactoring and rewriting so I wouldn't recommend using it in
production either. Building this all with clang is another risk factor.

I hope you didn't loose any data but you should seriously switch to
FreeBSD 9.0 and VirtualBox 4.1.10.

-- 
Bernhard Fröhlich
http://www.bluelife.at/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?784166fee4d71a2f571d1a455e4563a0>