From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Apr 2 12:50:38 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA23319 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 2 Apr 1997 12:50:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.enteract.com (qmailr@char-star.rdist.org [206.54.252.22]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA23302 for ; Wed, 2 Apr 1997 12:50:34 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 17705 invoked from network); 2 Apr 1997 20:43:49 -0000 Received: from enteract.com (stox@206.54.252.1) by char-star.rdist.org with SMTP; 2 Apr 1997 20:43:49 -0000 Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 14:43:48 -0600 (CST) From: Ken Stox To: Charles Henrich cc: nate@mt.sri.com, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 21" Monitor recommendations? In-Reply-To: <199704021930.OAA16118@crh.cl.msu.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I'm running the Panasonic E21 1600x1200x72Hz. Looks great, and was about $00 cheaper than the NEC. I paid ~$1500 at Best Buy. I'd recommend it. -Ken Stox On Wed, 2 Apr 1997, Charles Henrich wrote: > In lists.freebsd.hackers you write: > > >I'm in the market for some 21" monitors. I'm biased towards the > >Nanao/Eizo models (my 21" at work and my 17" at home are gorgeous), but > >the model I'm using at work is discontinued, and the replacement isn't > >nearly as nice. > > >Does anyone have any recommendations for a *real* 21" monitor that will > >handle 1600x1200@72Hz, with a decent dot-pitch? My current monitor will > >handle 1600@1200@76Hz, and has a .25 dot-pitch, and I'd like something > >that is comparable. I'd like to spend under $2K/monitor if possible. > > I run a NEC XP21 at 1600x1200@72 (maybe @70 ?) in any case, its extremely nice. > Very crisp clean picture, and has been for several years now. The NEC's are > still a bit pricey I think. It has a .25dp if I remember correctly. > > -Crh > -- > > Charles Henrich Michigan State University henrich@msu.edu > > http://pilot.msu.edu/~henrich >