From owner-freebsd-chat Mon May 12 13:31:29 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA03233 for chat-outgoing; Mon, 12 May 1997 13:31:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from main.statsci.com (main.statsci.com [206.63.206.110]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA03228 for ; Mon, 12 May 1997 13:31:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from apple.statsci.com [206.63.206.4] with smtp by main.statsci.com with smtp (/\oo/\ Smail3.1.29.1 #29.3 #3) id m0wR1ki-000ZMaC; Mon, 12 May 97 13:31 PDT Received: from apple.statsci.com [206.63.206.4] with smtp by apple.statsci.com with smtp (/\oo/\ Smail3.1.29.1 #29.3 #3) id m0wR1kh-0006uQC; Mon, 12 May 97 13:31 PDT Message-Id: X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96 To: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Reply-to addresses References: <3442.863437714@time.cdrom.com> In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 12 May 1997 04:48:34 -0700." <3442.863437714@time.cdrom.com> Reply-to: scott@statsci.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 12 May 1997 13:31:21 -0700 From: Scott Blachowicz Sender: owner-chat@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk "Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote: > I've seen it so much more often abused than used sensibly that I *am* > certain - kill it! kill it! death to cross-posting! :-) [mind you...I agree with you, but...] Does that mean we should kill this message? To: announce@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: current.freebsd.org now "open for business." Date: Mon, 12 May 1997 04:40:41 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" :-))) Or is the prohibition more like '"announce" groups don't count towards the limit of one group to post to'? Scott Blachowicz Ph: 206/283-8802x240 Mathsoft (Data Analysis Products Div) 1700 Westlake Ave N #500 scott@statsci.com Seattle, WA USA 98109 Scott.Blachowicz@seaslug.org