From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Aug 13 7: 0:36 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from dragon.ham.muohio.edu (dragon.ham.muohio.edu [134.53.141.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9465214DE4 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 1999 07:00:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from howardjp@wam.umd.edu) Received: from localhost (howardjp@localhost) by dragon.ham.muohio.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA26874 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 1999 09:16:10 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: dragon.ham.muohio.edu: howardjp owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 09:16:09 -0400 (EDT) From: Jamie Howard X-Sender: howardjp@dragon.ham.muohio.edu To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: libcompat proposition In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 12 Aug 1999, Jamie Howard wrote: > How would those functions which also exist in libc (or possibly other > libraries, I don't know) be handled? Just following up to myself here, NetBSD has a getopt_long() in libc ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/NetBSD-current/src/lib/libc/stdlib/ I saw someone say that anything NetBSD did in the name of portability must be right (in the test thread). :) Jamie To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message