From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 23 12:38:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC07A16A4CE for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 12:38:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7186643D48 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 12:38:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com (frontend2.internal [10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CD8EC3B008 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 07:38:45 -0500 (EST) X-Sasl-enc: 7j53ZbajMEHeqTc9UbUTBg 1101213523 Received: from gumby.localhost (unknown [80.41.56.83]) by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBEFB56F504 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 07:38:43 -0500 (EST) From: RW To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 12:39:33 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200411231239.33577.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: gbde: ufs & ffs X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 12:38:47 -0000 Why does the gbde section of the Handbook recommend running fsck -p -t ffs, which calls fsck_ffs, when ordinary filesystems are checked with fsck_ufs. According to , ffs runs on top of ufs "providing directory structure information, and a variety of disk access optimizations". Am I correct in thinking that soft-updates protect ffs from inconsistency, so that only a background ufs check is required? Is it possible to background check gbde partitions? If so, can it be done after booting is complete?