Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 02:32:15 +0400 (MSD) From: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= aka "Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage" <ache@astral.msk.su> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Frank Bartels <knarf@nasim.cube.net> Subject: Re: diffs and checksums Message-ID: <GTlxP1mSK5@astral.msk.su> In-Reply-To: <3u446o$oih@nasim.nasim.cube.net>; from Frank Bartels at 13 Jul 1995 23:46:00 %2B0200 References: <3u446o$oih@nasim.nasim.cube.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <3u446o$oih@nasim.nasim.cube.net> Frank Bartels writes: >I always wondered why all the patches are context and not unified >diffs. Unified diffs are much more readable and easier to edit. I >always read the diffs before doing the make and I sometimes disagree >with some (configuration) settings and want to edit the patches. I always wondered why some of the patches are unified and not context diffs. Context diffs are much more readable for human eye. I always read the diffs before doing the make and I sometimes disagree with some (configuration) settings, unified diffs makes this task more difficult. -- Andrey A. Chernov : And I rest so composedly, /Now, in my bed, ache@astral.msk.su : That any beholder /Might fancy me dead - FidoNet: 2:5020/230.3 : Might start at beholding me, /Thinking me dead. RELCOM Team,FreeBSD Team : E.A.Poe From "For Annie" 1849
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?GTlxP1mSK5>