From owner-freebsd-questions  Wed May 28 15:56:30 1997
Return-Path: <owner-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA09475
          for questions-outgoing; Wed, 28 May 1997 15:56:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA09466
          for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 28 May 1997 15:56:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id PAA24222; Wed, 28 May 1997 15:56:25 -0700 (PDT)
To: Brian Litzinger <brian@mpress.com>
cc: Steve Hovey <shovey@buffnet.net>, "Randy A. Katz" <randyk@ccsales.com>,
        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: 1 step forward 2 steps back 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 28 May 1997 13:31:05 PDT."
             <19970528133105.03570@mpress.com> 
Date: Wed, 28 May 1997 15:56:25 -0700
Message-ID: <24218.864860185@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> I've noticed the same thing.  Happens most often when we run vipw.
> Could we upgrade the vi to something more modern.  8-)

I have no idea what you guys are talking about.  We're running Keith
Bostic's nvi and probably the most modern "vi technology" available if
you don't count the upgrades he's made to it (all of which are, AFAIK,
awaiting the ncurses upgrade it depends on to go in first).

					Jordan