From owner-cvs-all Mon Jul 17 15:44:17 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FE3E37BBB1; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 15:44:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id PAA72119; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 15:44:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 15:44:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libfetch http.c In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 18 Jul 2000, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Kris Kennaway writes: > > Given the number of bugfixes going into fetch and libfetch, I have to > > wonder whether the MFC was premature - don't forget the code freeze is in > > 3 days. > > I discussed this with Jordan before committing, and he told me to go > ahead and MFC (the alternative, BTW, was not leaving the code as is, > but backing it out and reverting to the old fetch(1) until some time > after the release) Yes :-) I have heard quite a few bug reports with the new fetch..have you fixed all the ones you know of, and does the new one support all of the features of the old? Kris -- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message