From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 10 15:08:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CE65106567B; Tue, 10 May 2011 15:08:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from svn.freebsd.org (svn.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::2c]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 718D38FC19; Tue, 10 May 2011 15:08:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from svn.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by svn.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4AF8DhJ049225; Tue, 10 May 2011 15:08:13 GMT (envelope-from avg@svn.freebsd.org) Received: (from avg@localhost) by svn.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p4AF8D4J049223; Tue, 10 May 2011 15:08:13 GMT (envelope-from avg@svn.freebsd.org) Message-Id: <201105101508.p4AF8D4J049223@svn.freebsd.org> From: Andriy Gapon Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 15:08:13 +0000 (UTC) To: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-SVN-Group: head MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: svn commit: r221741 - head/sys/sys X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 15:08:13 -0000 Author: avg Date: Tue May 10 15:08:13 2011 New Revision: 221741 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/221741 Log: bitcount32: replace lengthy comment with a reference to SWAR MFC after: 5 days Modified: head/sys/sys/systm.h Modified: head/sys/sys/systm.h ============================================================================== --- head/sys/sys/systm.h Tue May 10 15:05:27 2011 (r221740) +++ head/sys/sys/systm.h Tue May 10 15:08:13 2011 (r221741) @@ -374,44 +374,8 @@ int alloc_unrl(struct unrhdr *uh); void free_unr(struct unrhdr *uh, u_int item); /* - * This is about as magic as it gets. fortune(1) has got similar code - * for reversing bits in a word. Who thinks up this stuff?? - * - * Yes, it does appear to be consistently faster than: - * while (i = ffs(m)) { - * m >>= i; - * bits++; - * } - * and - * while (lsb = (m & -m)) { // This is magic too - * m &= ~lsb; // or: m ^= lsb - * bits++; - * } - * Both of these latter forms do some very strange things on gcc-3.1 with - * -mcpu=pentiumpro and/or -march=pentiumpro and/or -O or -O2. - * There is probably an SSE or MMX popcnt instruction. - * - * I wonder if this should be in libkern? - * - * XXX Stop the presses! Another one: - * static __inline u_int32_t - * popcnt1(u_int32_t v) - * { - * v -= ((v >> 1) & 0x55555555); - * v = (v & 0x33333333) + ((v >> 2) & 0x33333333); - * v = (v + (v >> 4)) & 0x0F0F0F0F; - * return (v * 0x01010101) >> 24; - * } - * The downside is that it has a multiply. With a pentium3 with - * -mcpu=pentiumpro and -march=pentiumpro then gcc-3.1 will use - * an imull, and in that case it is faster. In most other cases - * it appears slightly slower. - * - * Another variant (also from fortune): - * #define BITCOUNT(x) (((BX_(x)+(BX_(x)>>4)) & 0x0F0F0F0F) % 255) - * #define BX_(x) ((x) - (((x)>>1)&0x77777777) \ - * - (((x)>>2)&0x33333333) \ - * - (((x)>>3)&0x11111111)) + * Population count algorithm using SWAR approach + * - "SIMD Within A Register". */ static __inline uint32_t bitcount32(uint32_t x)