From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 27 16:22:42 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F0131A2 for ; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 16:22:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andre@freebsd.org) Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (c00l3r.networx.ch [62.48.2.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91EC02B6F for ; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 16:22:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69107 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2013 17:10:12 -0000 Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([62.48.2.2]) (envelope-sender ) by c00l3r.networx.ch (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 27 Jul 2013 17:10:12 -0000 Message-ID: <51F3F3BA.20604@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 18:22:18 +0200 From: Andre Oppermann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Alexander V. Chernikov" Subject: Re: Recommendations for 10gbps NIC References: <51F0386D.2000709@acm.poly.edu> <51F16A07.9030505@FreeBSD.org> <1374852658.90079.YahooMailNeo@web121601.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <51F2A313.9070105@FreeBSD.org> <1374876857.42890.YahooMailNeo@web121603.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <51F37E97.3090203@FreeBSD.org> <51F387E8.6090704@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <51F387E8.6090704@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" , Luigi Rizzo X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 16:22:42 -0000 On 27.07.2013 10:42, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote: > On 27.07.2013 12:15, Luigi Rizzo wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Alexander V. Chernikov >> wrote: >> This makes me curious because i believe people have used netmap with >> the 82598 and achieved close to line rate even with 64-byte frames/one port, >> and i thought (maybe I am wrong ?) the various 2-port NICs use 4 lanes per port. >> So the number i remember does not match with your quote of 2.5Gt/s. >> Are all 82598 using 2.5GT/s (which is a gen.1 speed) instead of 5 ? > > Quoting 82598EB datasheet: > The PCIe v2.0 (2.5 GT/s) interface is used by the 82598EB as a host interface. It supports x8, x4, > x2 and x1 configurations at a speed of 2.5 GHz. The maximum aggregated raw ban.. > > Actually I discovered this exactly with netmap and 82598*-DA2 NIC :) Discussing the 82598 is moot because it has been replaced with the 82599 which supports x1-x8 at 5 GT/s. AFAIK you can't event buy the 82598 anymore. -- Andre