Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 15:18:49 -0500 From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> To: Matthew Jacob <mjacob44@yahoo.com> Cc: Wilko Bulte <wb@freebie.xs4all.nl> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/conf GENERIC Message-ID: <20041117151848.B780@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> In-Reply-To: <20041110050258.44554.qmail@web53105.mail.yahoo.com>; from mjacob44@yahoo.com on Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 09:02:57PM -0800 References: <20041109225940.GA12940@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20041110050258.44554.qmail@web53105.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthew Jacob [mjacob44@yahoo.com] wrote: > > My opinion, FWIW, is to put Alpha in the class of machines that is > supported by NetBSD, i.e., the hobby architectures. > I agree. Its sad, but I think we should remove alpha from HEAD. The main reason for holding on through the 5.x changes was to get alpha SMP support in a released version of FreeBSD. We have that now, in 5.x Drew
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041117151848.B780>