From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Oct 23 07:45:36 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id HAA00800 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 23 Oct 1997 07:45:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from crh.cl.msu.edu (crh.cl.msu.edu [35.8.1.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA00790 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 1997 07:45:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu) Received: (from henrich@localhost) by crh.cl.msu.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA09776; Thu, 23 Oct 1997 10:45:27 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <19971023104527.34841@crh.cl.msu.edu> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 10:45:27 -0400 From: Charles Henrich To: Guy Helmer Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CHILD_MAX no longer valid in 2.2.5-RELEASE? References: <19971023030651.02177@crh.cl.msu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.84 In-Reply-To: ; from Guy Helmer on Thu, Oct 23, 1997 at 08:54:44AM -0500 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 2.2.2-RELEASE X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1024/F7 FD C7 3A F5 6A 23 BF 76 C4 B8 C9 6E 41 A4 4F Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On the subject of Re: CHILD_MAX no longer valid in 2.2.5-RELEASE?, Guy Helmer stated: > > I've send CHILD_MAX to 512 on my news server, which (used) to have the > > effect of making the default maximum procs set to 512.. Bonus. Under > > 2.2.5-RELEASE it doesnt appear to be having any effect :( The only thing > > I can think of is, its placement in the config file is order important, or > > its no longer supported? If the latter, how do you effect the same change > > in 2.2.5? > > init uses the "daemon" entry in /etc/login.conf to set process resource > limits before executing /etc/rc; it appears to me that the "maxproc" entry > (maxproc=256) is the one you need to adjust (see also login.conf(5) and > getcap(3)). > > Hope that solves your problem, Guy I'll give it a shot, thanks! Im wondering that perhaps the name login.conf is a badly named file, especially if its more to do with userresources and nothing to do with the login process. Someone should also take CHILD_MAX out of LINT :) -Crh Charles Henrich Michigan State University henrich@msu.edu http://pilot.msu.edu/~henrich