From owner-freebsd-current Mon Jan 27 18:17:37 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FB1E37B401; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 18:17:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from ip68-14-63-240.no.no.cox.net (ip68-14-63-240.no.no.cox.net [68.14.63.240]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3570043F93; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 18:17:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from conrads@ip68-14-63-240.no.no.cox.net) Received: from ip68-14-63-240.no.no.cox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ip68-14-63-240.no.no.cox.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h0S2JDkb007200; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 20:19:13 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from conrads@ip68-14-63-240.no.no.cox.net) Received: (from conrads@localhost) by ip68-14-63-240.no.no.cox.net (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h0S2J87K007199; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 20:19:08 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.3 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20030117211040.B20672@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 20:19:07 -0600 (CST) Organization: A Rag-Tag Band of Drug-Crazed Hippies From: Conrad Sabatier To: Juli Mallett Subject: Re: tunefs using libufs. Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm getting some odd behavior with tunefs (5.0-CURRENT cvsupped and built Sunday, Jan 26). If a filesystem, rather than an actual device, is specified, it spits out a weird error message regarding my linproc mount: # tunefs -p /tmp tunefs: linproc: could not find special device My /etc/fstab: # Device Mountpoint FStype Options Dump Pass# /dev/ad0s1b none swap sw 0 0 /dev/ad0s1a / ufs rw 1 1 /dev/ad0s1f /tmp ufs rw 2 2 /dev/ad0s1g /usr ufs rw 2 2 /dev/ad0s1e /var ufs rw 2 2 /dev/acd0c /cdrom cd9660 ro,noauto 0 0 /dev/acd1c /cdrom1 cd9660 ro,noauto 0 0 proc /proc procfs rw 0 0 /dev/ad1s1e /mm ufs rw 2 2 linproc /compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0 Is anyone else seeing this? Could it just be the result of the gcc optimizations I'm using (an admittedly heavy set of flags)? Or might it be related to the recent changes the OP mentioned? On 18-Jan-2003 Juli Mallett wrote: > Can I get some tests of these changes to make tunefs use libufs? > > Thanx, > juli. -- Conrad Sabatier - "In Unix veritas" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message