From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Mar 29 19:38:30 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from spook.navinet.net (spook.navinet.net [206.25.93.69]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 391DD14D98 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 19:38:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from forrie@forrie.com) Received: from forresta (forrie.ne.mediaone.net [24.128.73.234]) by spook.navinet.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id WAA00576; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 22:36:22 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <4.1.19990329223913.00971e60@206.25.93.69> X-Sender: forrie@206.25.93.69 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 22:39:57 -0500 To: Greg Pavelcak , Ludwig Pummer From: Forrest Aldrich Subject: Re: Too old for bsd.port.mk? Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <19990329214611.A17800@oitunix.oit.umass.edu> References: <4.1.19990329182400.00a6f990@mail-r> <4.1.19990329190607.00a743c0@216.67.14.69> <4.1.19990329182400.00a6f990@mail-r> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 09:46 PM 3/29/99 -0500, Greg Pavelcak wrote: >Why should he have to immediately following a make world? > >Greg [ ... ] My thoughts exactly. I would presume that a fresh cvsup and then make world (buildworld/installworld) would take care of this. Why the different approach? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message