From owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 13 16:09:27 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F8537B401; Sun, 13 Apr 2003 16:09:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from builder.freebsdmall.com (builder.freebsdmall.com [65.86.180.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30BDB43FA3; Sun, 13 Apr 2003 16:09:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from murray@builder.freebsdmall.com) Received: (from root@localhost) by builder.freebsdmall.com (8.12.9/8.11.6) id h3DN9QWs003471; Sun, 13 Apr 2003 16:09:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from murray) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2003 16:09:26 -0700 From: Murray Stokely To: Tom Rhodes Message-ID: <20030413160926.E902@freebsdmall.com> References: <200304082353.h38NrZXM010842@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030412183216.Z43794@freebsdmall.com> <20030413145741.S28372@znfgre.tberna.bet> <20030414062201.184a0581.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030414062201.184a0581.trhodes@FreeBSD.org>; from trhodes@FreeBSD.org on Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 06:22:01AM -0400 X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/0E451F7D X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: E2CA 411D DD44 53FD BB4B 3CB5 B4D7 10A2 0E45 1F7D cc: Doug Barton cc: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org cc: brueffer@FreeBSD.org cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en docs.sgml X-BeenThere: cvs-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the doc and www trees List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2003 23:09:28 -0000 On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 06:22:01AM -0400, Tom Rhodes wrote: > > Do you have a URL for that? And how do they list it? The RFC's have it as > > IPSec, IPSEC, and IPsec, with the last being the most popular. Seems like > > as long as we're consistent, we're at least in the ballpark. > > > > Personally, last I checked, we were using the `IPSec' spelling in both > the sources and in most (if not all) of the documentation. I think it > should just stay like that. Doug, our word list is maintained in the Doc Project Primer : doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/fdp-primer and we default to the O'Reilly spelling for unlisted words. The O'Reilly word list is linked from that article. I'm not sure what two sources Tom is referring to above, but it's spelled as 'IPSEC' on the O'Reilly word list, which is the second most popular spelling according to earlier posters on this thread. I'm fine with switching to 'IPsec' if it is in fact more common in the literature, but we just need to keep our word lists updated so that someone else doesn't come through and switch it back in 6 months. - Murray