Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 27 Feb 2000 18:20:27 -0600 (CST)
From:      Steve Price <sprice@hiwaay.net>
To:        Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com>
Cc:        Doug Barton <Doug@gorean.org>, obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, Satoshi Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: QUICK RESPONCE NEEDED:  Netscape 4.72 handling
Message-ID:  <Pine.OSF.4.21.0002271817220.3431-100000@fly.HiWAAY.net>
In-Reply-To: <20000227191320.B21819@shadow.blackdawn.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 27 Feb 2000, Will Andrews wrote:

# I honestly do not see any reason why knobs cannot be added to the ports
# to allow U.S. security features, or whatever. I also don't see any point

The problem with making strong encryption a knob is the same reason
you state below.  We won't have the packages for them anymore and
Mr. O'Brien will probably be a mite bit upset over that. :)

# in prefixing the names with "netscape". I would go even farther as to
# put the Linux option as a knob, but I feel that we would lose the
# packages for the Linux versions.




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OSF.4.21.0002271817220.3431-100000>