Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 17:23:28 -0500 From: Brian Reichert <reichert@numachi.com> To: Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 'dynamic' options questions Message-ID: <20041207222328.GH20981@numachi.com> In-Reply-To: <20041207185301.GL39558@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> References: <20041207185301.GL39558@pcwin002.win.tue.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 07:53:01PM +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote: > So, I guess what I'm asking is: > > - what's the 'correct' way of doing auto-dependencies > - is the form in which there is no way of forcing such a dependency a bug > (ie can I send-pr this example and any others I come across) As I hope to put together a jail-based package builder myself, what I was considering, and might as well ask you about: Could you not, for your jails, maintain a pkgtools.conf(5) file? Just copy it in when you provision your jail, then use 'portupgrade -P' to let your jail fetch needed packages to satisfy dependancies, as to build the targeted package? > --Stijn -- Brian Reichert <reichert@numachi.com> 37 Crystal Ave. #303 Daytime number: (603) 434-6842 Derry NH 03038-1713 USA BSD admin/developer at large
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041207222328.GH20981>