From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Mar 8 9:19:23 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from argon.blackdawn.com (deepspace9.dcds.edu [207.231.151.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE5437C253 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2000 09:19:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from will@blackdawn.com) Received: by argon.blackdawn.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 85C7819E5; Wed, 8 Mar 2000 12:19:08 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2000 12:19:08 -0500 From: Will Andrews To: Roland Jesse Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/17265: New port devel/tmake Message-ID: <20000308121908.A422@argon.blackdawn.com> References: <200003081710.JAA14148@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <200003081710.JAA14148@freefall.freebsd.org>; from jesse@prinz-atm.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De on Wed, Mar 08, 2000 at 09:10:02AM -0800 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, Mar 08, 2000 at 09:10:02AM -0800, Roland Jesse wrote: > I disagree. It is kind of annoying when ports are only made in a way > that they are good as dependencies for other ports but not for serious > development besides that. As much as it is necessary to install header > files in case of libraries (see math/vtk for a real bad example) it is > a good idea to install not only the freebsd-g++ templates for tmake > but the couple others that are available, too. How would the developer use the extra OS configuration files in the location that they are installed, on a FreeBSD machine? -- Will Andrews GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message