From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jun 14 4:13:14 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from pcwin002.win.tue.nl (pcwin002.win.tue.nl [131.155.71.72]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B45737C140; Wed, 14 Jun 2000 04:13:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from stijn@pcwin002.win.tue.nl) Received: by pcwin002.win.tue.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 467BF18BB; Wed, 14 Jun 2000 13:13:26 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 13:13:26 +0200 From: Stijn Hoop To: Neil Blakey-Milner Cc: thomas@hentschel.net, steve@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Zope port revamp [was ports/18444: zope port outdated] Message-ID: <20000614131325.B25770@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> References: <200005290250.TAA41586@freefall.freebsd.org> <200006132355.QAA19931@dorothy.hentschel.net> <20000614123022.A12825@mithrandr.moria.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <20000614123022.A12825@mithrandr.moria.org>; from nbm@mithrandr.moria.org on Wed, Jun 14, 2000 at 12:30:23PM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, Jun 14, 2000 at 12:30:23PM +0200, Neil Blakey-Milner wrote: > On Tue 2000-06-13 (17:14), thomas@hentschel.net wrote: > > In order to make all that easily install-able and accessible from > > within FreeBSD, I thought of using the ports system. For that I > > would have to create a separate zope section (/usr/ports/zope). > > You wouldn't have to. Chances are it'd fit quite nicely in ports/www. > If you really envisage 50 products, though, I'm sure it's possible get > some leeway. It would certainly be a virtual category. Well, check out http://www.zope.org/Products, and note that there are over 140 'products' available (there is a link at the bottom to the next twenty products, I missed it the first time ;) As I'm not yet familiar with Zope, I wouldn't know how many of these products would need to be ported or anything, but if there is interest in these it would surely fill up ports/www... Maybe a common prefix would help in the meantime, like the perl modules? Something like ports/www/zope-[squishdot,wiki,...]? > > > Is that something which sounds feasible ? If so, I'll submit a > > patch for the upcoming Zope-2.2.0 release with that > > functionality. > > I'd be happy to commit the Zope updates, since I was about to start > doing the same. For now, it'd work fine in its current position, > ports/www/zope, and maybe just zope Products need go in ports/zope, if > one is created in the future. I'd say if you create ports/zope, IMHO you should put the main distribution there also. --Stijn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message