From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 20:37:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E353016A437 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:37:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from terje+geom@elde.net) Received: from smtp.elde.net (us.elde.net [66.246.223.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26D6143D64 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:37:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from terje+geom@elde.net) Received: from smtp.elde.net (343006.ds.nac.net [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.elde.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8B8365003 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:37:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (60.80-203-96.nextgentel.com [80.203.96.60]) (Authenticated sender: terje@elde.net) by smtp.elde.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E21264F56 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:37:34 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4404B440.3050108@elde.net> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:36:16 +0100 From: Terje Elde User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: Re: GELI compatibility with GBDE X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:37:40 -0000 Jack T wrote: > My question is: can GELI access > a partition that was encrypted by GBDE? > No clear and definitive answer so far, so to sum it up: No, they're not compatible, and you cannot access a GBDE partition from GELI. It's not just a question of algorithm choice, there are a lot of other factors as well, such as how the encryption algorithms are used, on-disk layout etc. I wouldn't hold my breath for them to become compatible either. Making GELI read GBDE partitions would be like reimplementing GBDE (or large parts) inside GELI. No point, since we already have a GBDE. It'd probably be easier to look into making GBDE support the features you want, than make GELI read GBDE. Terje