From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Apr 28 11:51:58 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3772B1E5DC for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:51:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 848091208 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:51:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 83876B1E5DB; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:51:58 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83292B1E5DA for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:51:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x232.google.com (mail-wm0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CFDC1206 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:51:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x232.google.com with SMTP id a17so60890342wme.0 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 04:51:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=me5VJgLfeYyUS934Vt70pqjyHPQD8Ap11F3KOgUJUxE=; b=f2lF5Hj8nPE8xytlZbQPWdWL0RYfwi4EGqoxHhb8ahXZP2huhQ/M4STTOVPKwwMyQf Ga8wY2AkTxXoGmz8M4hRI5TbVcHXYZ7YkNmYKlzwgy7RSZBrcGdmdjJFSanuPPnBwsUB MAQWTUZEWpfrJau29zskHIw4hG8BaUXf26j6KCDv1Ex6en2vfZKQA/SPvzYCknIKB6HJ PpDt8qLyX3SZO34j+hzD3om7JLBABHXMHTc51FS3ru/uRaFKYxfPU9qSMoH47MBXbv9K whd/1QSYkDCdmiimDqJHVLuEAGUcS4corMGFNz7ewDrdIRvgNQRug4/LO/WRraDA44ej t8QQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=me5VJgLfeYyUS934Vt70pqjyHPQD8Ap11F3KOgUJUxE=; b=NFv48GaT5oBfGwknP6mqHWL1EJMbK2wMns0zJl8uE9iQUATNrvkl5cRKy9P9qTv27q kXluVIlP4tJS37e/8c58tt5k1r59Ww31V7Z9/Rp5Gr8pycXE0onM9JVXWo6yR9xZqk7u T+NzLTwbVUxA1I4EoTe8GkywaOs31nOrH7XZWmHkmDhXJ5x5KxfKl7YAKa8KZDnWt94r SzWTM45szcWLwAbEXPiq/MhMsIY7wkMALXpqARhiqAZofo5/JFnZfnj3cUs2QeGrD6yq 40od6yMVLtUBZV9HOsnbAKUvD5GdE6Y1kZGn9M6rC/VIAQPAXz+PzUcwGYAHvQL+Lg4Q mWrg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWj1cXZmYoPD7BOjOjw2R9ngVw0X2mBD0yDDZmNAmEq6WPP6V/zMa8kATNvqJh1KA== X-Received: by 10.194.2.130 with SMTP id 2mr14778933wju.77.1461844315877; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 04:51:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com ([2.222.64.48]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 186sm34748690wmk.2.2016.04.28.04.51.54 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 28 Apr 2016 04:51:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 12:51:53 +0100 From: RW To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports tree gone unstable? Message-ID: <20160428125153.49d29836@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <201604280648.u3S6mhDX006562@gw.catspoiler.org> References: <572140C0.1030903@sorbs.net> <201604280648.u3S6mhDX006562@gw.catspoiler.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.2) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:51:58 -0000 On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 23:48:43 -0700 (PDT) Don Lewis wrote: > I'd lose many hours of potential build time. Because of the > infrequent upgrades I would have to deal with all of the intervening > special cases in UPDATING that accumulated between upgrades, and the > portupgrade -fr and -a options didn't interoperate well, so I ended > up having to build some ports multiple times. If things crashed, > then I'd have to run portupgrade -rf again, rebuilding a lot of > things unnecessarily since there was no way of doing a restart. FWIW the portupgrade -fr entries in UPDATING only need be followed if you are doing a partial update. Any port affected by these gets its port revision bumped, so is rebuilt as part of a portupgrade -a.