From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 3 16:54:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B096216A4CE for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 16:54:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from spam2.snu.ac.kr (spam2.snu.ac.kr [147.46.10.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E95543D41 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 16:54:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nospam@users.sourceforge.net) Received: (snipe 6320 invoked by alias); 4 Mar 2004 00:54:40 +0900(KST) Received: from nospam@users.sourceforge.net with SpamSniper2.76 (Processed in 0.048148 secs); Received: from unknown (HELO sis1.snu.ac.kr) (147.46.10.36) by 0 with SMTP; 4 Mar 2004 00:54:40 +0900(KST) X-RCPTTO: ports@FreeBSD.org,mikej@rogers.com, Received: from users.sourceforge.net (cisr.snu.ac.kr [147.46.44.181]) by sis1.snu.ac.kr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i240p9Us292054; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:51:09 +0900 Message-ID: <40467E51.5060304@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 09:54:41 +0900 From: Rob User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040207 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Jakubik , ports@FreeBSD.org References: <20040303232734.HKTS434741.fep02-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com@win2000> In-Reply-To: <20040303232734.HKTS434741.fep02-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com@win2000> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: XFree86 4.4.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 00:54:43 -0000 Mike Jakubik wrote: > With the release of XFree86 4.4 and all the license talk, I am just curious, > doest anyone know if FreeBSD will be receiving a port of 4.4? Coincidentely, these days I browsed through the Mandrake Linux webpages. The beta release of 10.0 had 4.4, but for some reason they reverted to 4.3 for the rc1. I couldn't find out what problems they had with 4.4, but it made me suspicious about the stability of 4.4. Wonder what others have to say to this. Cheers, Rob.